.jpg) |
| Imaged by StockSnap | pixabay.com |
Written by Muhammad Natsir Tahar
The state can run scientifically if the political elements
in it can be canceled. They lie about democracy. They laughed at Machiavelli. They
released melodramas and bought up all the protagonist roles. Even the
opposition is just a delayed oligarchy. They will be the same, until proven
otherwise.
Too strong political oligarchic interference can cause the
country to go the other way: towards a dystopia. Politics has even been
uprooted from its etymological roots for a long time, about the Greek version
of the city's dream or the Roman version of ars politica which means
proficiency in state matters.
Maybe even the political dictions of this century are like a
euphemism behind the collective nature of the circus way to maintain or take
power.
Or when political humans who are piggybacking and being
supported by the state create their own theory of truth.
In a real democratic orchestra, absurdity is no longer seen
as flawed: dynasties, feudalism, paternalism, ethnocentrism, individual cults
and other non-ethical forms that make democracy just a brand to hide the
oligarchy.
The state must be cleansed of the political roots of
oligarchic power with a set of erroneous theories that are far from essential.
We can hold two political concepts.
First, the classical view of Aristotle which states that
politics is used to achieve a universal good which is considered to have a
higher moral value than interests outside it.
Second, Max Weber's modern view, that politics is everything
related to the administration of the state. He sees the state from a static
formal juridical point of view and introduces an ideal form for a modern and
rational state.
Aristotle's concept requires state administrators who are
wise and have high morals and Weber wants the state to be managed
scientifically, free from chaotic and dystopian political fingers.
Professional work units within the state, such as legal
apparatus, must be kept away from political orders by one or a group of elites
who find it difficult to adapt to Weber's version of the modern state concept,
as well as the state moral philosophy mandated by Aristotle.
If we dream of having a country by adopting moral and modern
concepts, then the state must have a strong immune system to filter itself from
contamination by oligarchic viruses that paralyze the role of the state as a
common home.
Political parties or political parties must only be machines
that function to produce and recommend the best children of the nation to be
employed into the country. If a political party fails to do this, its existence
must be rearranged, abolished and even punished.
Political parties must be able to shift their quadrants as
part of a utopian solution, not even pressing the square of power and the
acrobatic composition of the cabinet and high institutions throughout the
period.
Political parties are more appropriate and should function
as booster rockets and immediately release, when the spacecraft has passed
through the atmosphere.
The president and executive positions under him who are
electorally elected, should be limited to only one period, because almost all
incumbents will mobilize units within the state as a means of maintaining their
power, and the democratic process will not be able to run fairly, no matter how
many garbled narratives are made to refute this fact.
Scientific states can also be run on autopilot. Logically,
the system in a country can run without the presence of a leader.
Autopilot is better known as a navigation, mechanical,
electrical, or hydraulic system that guides a vehicle without human
intervention.
If the country already has a blueprint and is only managed
by dignified and professional humans, it will not matter whether the president
or mayor is only tasked with reading speech texts or cutting ribbons.
This also parallels the dream of the platonics who ground
all theory of the state with one aristocratic dogma as opposed to the
oligarchic rivalry, which now dominates the stage.
If we penetrate far into the future, in 50 years or even 20
years, it is the algorithm system that is at the peak of civilization.
Rhetorical speeches, and superficial debates typical of the
electoral democracy of the human species were immediately stopped and replaced
by automated machines that were precise and effective and far from
scientifically wrong. ~
Comments